OC in Sale Agreement + Is it a safe option
Posted: January 13th, 2015, 7:16 pm
Hi,
I am looking forward to buy a flat in Bangalore with an apartment with below state. Could you please suggest how to proceed with the sale agreement?
Situation:
A ready to move in apartment (G+3) with 36 units. 30 units got sold & 27 units got occupied by the buyers. OC hasn't been provided yet. The builder is promising to provide the same.
There are quite a deviations from the approved plan. There is a set back deviation & In the terrace there is a penthouse, 2 flat units, Gym and Club house which are violations from the approved plan. In the approved plan there was only G+3 there is no mention of penthouse, 2 flat units, Gym & Club house in the terrace.
Now, the builder says (via Sales representative), due to TDR (Transfer of Development Rights), they had constructed those extra units in the terrace floor (Penthouse, 2 flat units, Gym & Club House) and they (the builder) are planning to get the approval for those units as well.
However, the builder has not applied for the approval for the TDR yet.
Following are few facts / current state:
1. There is no TDR approval. TDR is a state where government acquired some of the builder land for road widening and allows the builder to construct extra units (usually another floor).
2. Approval for updated plan. Here is the complication. the old plan is G+3. The new plan is G+4. Now, The process to get G+4 approval is little complicated than the G+3.
The builder is promising to get the OC on his own expense and agrees to put a clause in the sale agreement as well.
Now how should I proceed with the sale agreement & registration.
Can I get into the sale agreement & register the property with a clause of getting the OC within a stipulated time by the builder in the sale agreement?
Does this clause really makes sense or is it just a eye-wash? Will this clause assure me the OC?
I heard OC is something only the builder can initiate or obtain. What if the builder abscond (has there been any case)?
Can the builder legally escapes from the responsibility of getting the OC (due to any unknown reasons)?
How long the legal battle can happen before we get OC?
Given that we have registered and occupied the OC will the buyer will be at any risk of legal action by BBMP or court?
In general, what are the other risks with above clause.
Another option for me is to do the registration and wait till OC is issued and then register the property and then occupy the flat. Is this option have any risks? Yes, if the builder didn't get the OC in stipulated time then I have to battle legally to get the agreement amount. But is this option worth to consider?
The ideal option, I am looking is, holding off 20% of total amount and complete the registration. This 20% will be given to the builder once the OC is ready. However, the builder isn't agreeing to this option. Has anyone tried this option or has any builder agreed to this option?
Thanks
I am looking forward to buy a flat in Bangalore with an apartment with below state. Could you please suggest how to proceed with the sale agreement?
Situation:
A ready to move in apartment (G+3) with 36 units. 30 units got sold & 27 units got occupied by the buyers. OC hasn't been provided yet. The builder is promising to provide the same.
There are quite a deviations from the approved plan. There is a set back deviation & In the terrace there is a penthouse, 2 flat units, Gym and Club house which are violations from the approved plan. In the approved plan there was only G+3 there is no mention of penthouse, 2 flat units, Gym & Club house in the terrace.
Now, the builder says (via Sales representative), due to TDR (Transfer of Development Rights), they had constructed those extra units in the terrace floor (Penthouse, 2 flat units, Gym & Club House) and they (the builder) are planning to get the approval for those units as well.
However, the builder has not applied for the approval for the TDR yet.
Following are few facts / current state:
1. There is no TDR approval. TDR is a state where government acquired some of the builder land for road widening and allows the builder to construct extra units (usually another floor).
2. Approval for updated plan. Here is the complication. the old plan is G+3. The new plan is G+4. Now, The process to get G+4 approval is little complicated than the G+3.
The builder is promising to get the OC on his own expense and agrees to put a clause in the sale agreement as well.
Now how should I proceed with the sale agreement & registration.
Can I get into the sale agreement & register the property with a clause of getting the OC within a stipulated time by the builder in the sale agreement?
Does this clause really makes sense or is it just a eye-wash? Will this clause assure me the OC?
I heard OC is something only the builder can initiate or obtain. What if the builder abscond (has there been any case)?
Can the builder legally escapes from the responsibility of getting the OC (due to any unknown reasons)?
How long the legal battle can happen before we get OC?
Given that we have registered and occupied the OC will the buyer will be at any risk of legal action by BBMP or court?
In general, what are the other risks with above clause.
Another option for me is to do the registration and wait till OC is issued and then register the property and then occupy the flat. Is this option have any risks? Yes, if the builder didn't get the OC in stipulated time then I have to battle legally to get the agreement amount. But is this option worth to consider?
The ideal option, I am looking is, holding off 20% of total amount and complete the registration. This 20% will be given to the builder once the OC is ready. However, the builder isn't agreeing to this option. Has anyone tried this option or has any builder agreed to this option?
Thanks